650 Crore Delhi Health Procurement Scam: Former DGHS Ready to Turn Approver, Probe May Gain Fresh Momentum

0
18
₹650 Crore Delhi Health Procurement Scam
The alleged ₹650-crore Delhi Health Department procurement scam investigation has gained momentum after former DGHS Dr. Vatsala Aggarwal reportedly expressed willingness to become an approver (government witness).

New Delhi: HL July 15, 2026

The investigation into the alleged Rs. 650-crore medicine and medical equipment procurement scam in Delhi’s Health Department may enter a crucial phase, with former Director General of Health Services (DGHS) Dr. Vatsala Aggarwal reportedly expressing willingness to become an approver, or government witness, in the case.

According to sources familiar with the investigation, Dr. Aggarwal has indicated that she is ready to cooperate with investigators and provide information regarding the procurement process, tender approvals and decision-making related to the purchases that are under scrutiny. Investigating agencies believe her testimony could help establish the sequence of events and identify the roles of various officials and private entities involved in the alleged irregularities.

Dr. Vatsala Agrawal, Former DGHS, Delhi Govt.

Investigation Focused on Procurement Decisions

The case revolves around the alleged irregularities in the purchase of medicines, surgical items and medical equipment for Delhi government hospitals. Investigators are examining whether procurement norms were violated, contracts were awarded improperly, or purchases were made at inflated prices, resulting in financial losses to the government.

Officials associated with the investigation have reportedly questioned Dr. Aggarwal on multiple occasions regarding tender procedures, technical approvals, evaluation of bids and financial clearances. Her statements are expected to be matched with procurement records, payment trails and other documentary evidence collected during the investigation.

Approver Status Could Strengthen the Case

Legal experts say that if an accused person is granted approver status under the law, they are expected to make a full and truthful disclosure of all facts related to the offence. In return, the court may consider granting relief from prosecution or punishment, subject to legal provisions and the value of the evidence provided.

Investigators believe that if Dr. Aggarwal is formally accepted as an approver, her testimony could provide fresh leads about the functioning of the procurement network and help identify the responsibility of other accused persons.

Multiple Officials Under Scanner

The probe is also examining the alleged roles of several former officials linked to the procurement process, including former procurement authorities and finance-related officers. Investigators are reviewing official files, tender documents, purchase approvals and financial transactions to determine whether procurement rules were bypassed or manipulated.

The agencies are also looking into allegations that certain companies received undue benefits through inflated pricing and irregular tender practices. These claims remain under investigation, and no final conclusions have been reached.

Main Accused Still Absconding

Meanwhile, the principal accused in the case, Rajiv Rangila, continues to evade arrest. Investigating agencies are carrying out searches and are examining all possible leads to locate him. Officials believe his arrest could provide further clarity regarding financial transactions, alleged middlemen and the execution of procurement contracts.

Investigation Continues

The investigation remains ongoing, and authorities have not yet filed their final conclusions before the court. The eventual decision on granting approver status to Dr. Vatsala Aggarwal will rest with the competent court after considering the request and the applicable legal provisions.

The case has drawn significant attention because of its potential impact on public healthcare procurement and accountability in government spending. Investigators are expected to continue examining documentary evidence and witness statements before taking further legal action against those found responsible.